四川奋力夺取一季度开门红******
5个能源项目、43个产业项目等陆续开工
四川奋力夺取一季度开门红
本报成都1月4日讯（记者刘畅）作为2023年经济工作的“起手式”，1月3日，四川省举行了一季度重大项目现场推进活动。本次活动现场推进项目423个、总投资7483.7亿元，涉及能源、交通、水利、现代产业、教育卫生等领域。活动的举行对于动员四川全省坚定信心、保持定力，全力以赴“拼经济、搞建设”，以更大力度抓项目促投资将起到积极作用。
成都市华能彭州燃机项目是此次启动的35个能源项目之一，该项目将建设2套400兆瓦级燃气—蒸汽联合循环机组，配置2台F级燃气轮机及发电机、2台余热锅炉等相关配套设施。泸州市川投泸州天然气发电项目总投资32.16亿元，2023年预计完成投资10亿元，是川南地区大型骨干支撑电源点。除此之外，还有电源项目、电网项目和煤炭储备基地项目，总投资达386.2亿元。2022年夏季，四川曾面临历史同期最极端高温、最少降雨量、最高电力负荷的“三最”叠加局面，电力保供遭遇严峻挑战，这批项目的建成将推动四川形成多能互补、安全可靠的电力供应体系，增强电煤应急保障能力。
四川各市州还推出了一批重大产业项目。绵阳市欣盛显示驱动项目总投资100.5亿元，建成后将为绵阳新型显示产业集群发展提供强劲支撑。据悉，该项目在2022年11月举办的第十届中国（绵阳）科技城国际科技博览会期间签约落地，不到两个月的时间便实现开工建设。“绵阳抓项目、促投资的效率非常高。”欣盛显示驱动项目负责人熊伟涛表示，企业选择到绵阳发展是正确的选择。
本次现场推进活动包括43个产业项目，分布于新型材料制造、锂电及晶硅光伏材料、医药医疗器械及食品加工等方面，总投资达660.2亿元。这些项目的建成将有效提升四川制造业竞争能力，加快构建具有地区特色的现代产业体系。
12个教育卫生项目总投资达56.4亿元，包括教育项目5个、卫生项目7个。其中，四川大学华西第二医院天府医院项目是国家在川布局建设的首个国家区域医疗中心项目。项目建成后，将引领带动四川乃至西南地区儿科医疗服务能力提升。
开工总数333个、总投资金额6380.9亿元、投放基金565.3亿元的政策性开发性金融工具项目引人关注。2022年11月底，四川省组织工作专班，完成了本次启动项目的申报、资金投放和开工建设等全部流程。在这些项目中，农业农村基础设施项目达37个、总投资578亿元。这是历年来四川一季度重大项目开工仪式或推进活动现场中“农味”最重的一次。
2023年是全面贯彻落实党的二十大精神的开局之年，开局关乎全局，起步决定后程。本次活动举行的时间距离四川省委经济工作会议召开不到10天，全面体现四川拿出开局就是决战、起跑就要冲刺的劲头。奋力夺取一季度开门红对全力推动四川经济运行整体好转、实现质的有效提升和量的合理增长提供了强劲动力。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 快三注册地图 |
